Saturday, July 31, 2004

GOP flyer

Remember this from a few days ago? Here ya go..."The liberal democrats have already begun their attacks and the new electronic voting machines do not have a paper ballot to verify your vote in case of a recount. Make sure your vote counts. Order your absentee ballot today...Don't be fooled by imitations. This is the official Repubican Party absentee ballot form."


Friday, July 30, 2004

The Village Voice: Nation: Mondo Boston: 'Terror' Against the Press by James Ridgeway

Well well well. Another lie. Surprised? Bush has the FBI shilling for him now?

The Village Voice: Nation: Mondo Boston: 'Terror' Against the Press by James Ridgeway

While you are there, you might want to read this article about possible election manipulation. The more we get these scenarios out, the less chance they have of actually happening. Remember the Bush plan to steal DNC thunder? Thanks to the New Republic, it didn't have nearly the impact it could have

ABQjournal: Obtaining Cheney Rally Ticket Requires Signing Bush Endorsement

Shouldn't an AMERICAN be able to see the Vice President? Damn repuglicans are so thinned skinned. Poor Cheney...he's gonna have one hell of a time with Edwards if he can't take a bit from some rank and file dems.

Uh, and this event is on tax-payer funded property, is it not?

"Unless you sign an endorsement for President George W. Bush, you're not getting any passes." Zieg Heil!

ABQjournal: Obtaining Cheney Rally Ticket Requires Signing Bush Endorsement

Bush losing it...

at least he's got a prescription drug plan and can afford the meds....
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_4930.shtml
Bush’s erratic behavior and sharp mood swings led White House physician Col. Richard J. Tubb to put the President on powerful anti-depressant drugs after he stormed off stage rather than answer reporters' questions about his relationship with indicted Enron executive Kenneth J. Lay, but White House insiders say the strong, prescription medications seem to increase Bush’s sullen behavior towards those around him.

Should have seen it coming. In June, there was this:
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_4636.shtml
Bush's Erratic Behavior Worries White House AidesBy DOUG THOMPSON & TERESA HAMPTONJun 4, 2004, 06:15
President George W. Bush’s increasingly erratic behavior and wide mood swings has the halls of the West Wing buzzing lately as aides privately express growing concern over their leader’s state of mind.

TheBostonChannel.com - News - Tom Ridge May Step Down So He Can Make More Money

So, Tommy boy is stepping down. He makes nearly $180,000 a year and can't put his kids through college? If Ridge can't do it on $180 grand a year, how on earth does the Bush administration (who wants to cut federal loan programs, after school programs, won't fully fund No Child Left Behind) think that the average American can do it? Perhaps he ought to do what I would have to do if I was faced w/ putting kids through college -  school loans, community college for the first two years, have the kid get a job and help put themselves through college, skip the ivy league even if they are smarter than Bush, or sell that $800,000 and live with my means!!

TheBostonChannel.com - News - Tom Ridge May Step Down So He Can Make More Money: "Ridge, 58, has explained to colleagues that he needs to earn money to comfortably put his two children, Tommy Jr. and Lesley, through college, officials said. Both are now teenagers. Ridge earns $175,700 a year as a Cabinet secretary. "
...
"Ridge owns an $873,000 home in Bethesda, Md., with his wife, Michele, which they bought last year with a $784,800 mortgage, according to property and banking records. Ridge's most recent financial disclosure reports, filed in early 2003, showed that he owned between $122,000 and $787,000 in stocks and funds, including modest ownership in The Walt Disney Co., General Electric, Nike, Oracle Corp. and Microsoft Corp. "

Thursday, July 29, 2004

azfamily.com | News for Phoenix, Arizona | AP Headlines

Hey republicans -- more of your TAX money wasted! Guess it's always better to have it be unaccounted for than to help people here at home, huh?

azfamily.com | News for Phoenix, Arizona | AP Headlines

Remember that Tucker Carlson said this today

when the repuglicans trot out the moderates that they want the world to see rather than the fucking neocon warmongers that run the party, remember that Tucker Carlson said: For the past four days, the Kerry campaign has ruthlessly suppressed the effervescent (and often paranoid) activist wing of the Democratic Party, for fear of alienating middle America. They believe this is smart strategy, and they're probably right. But it's also dishonest.

Methinks his damned bowtie is too tight


Here

The Stepford Democrats
Posted: 8:35 p.m. ET
From Tucker Carlson, co-host, CNN's "Crossfire"

I ran into a well-known gay activist tonight just as the prime-time lineup was beginning. Why haven't you given a speech at the convention yet? I asked. Because I'm not allowed to, he said, laughing.

But he wasn't joking.

The most striking thing about the Democratic convention this year is how few Democratic themes have been heard from the podium. With the exception of Al Sharpton, an uncontrollable force of nature who has so intimidated the Democratic leadership that they leave him alone, no speaker I've seen has deviated significantly from the prepared text.

And the prepared text mentions almost none of the stock Democratic talking points: Bush stole the election, lied to get us into war, and threw the profits to Halliburton and the Carlyle Group, all to please the Saudis and the religious right, and also to avenge his father's 1992 loss. Because Bush is both diabolical and a moron, brilliantly evil and mentally retarded.

That's been the substance of the average Democratic stump speech this year. You wouldn't know if from watching the convention. For the past four days, the Kerry campaign has ruthlessly suppressed the effervescent (and often paranoid) activist wing of the Democratic Party, for fear of alienating middle America. They believe this is smart strategy, and they're probably right. But it's also dishonest. And it makes for an awfully boring convention.

State: GOP flier questions new voting equipment

Amazing. Those touch screen machines that Jeb insisted were so good, those machines that the democrats have been demanding have a paper trail for validation, are now not good enough for the repug-licans. Vote absentee, they say. Note that the above news link comes on the SAME DAY as the article linked below.

State: GOP flier questions new voting equipment

TNR Online | July Surprise?

This is SO important. So so so important. Will people even pay attention?? Hell no.

This is a long post. It's the entire original TNR article from July 19th. After this, people should absolutely suffer NO illusion that an Osama capture in October would just "happen". This - to me - further proves that this administration will go to any length to manipulate the massess. Sadly, they are ripe for the pickin'.

The entire TNR article follows this:

TNR Online | July Surprise? (print): Post date: 07.29.04 "This afternoon, Pakistan's interior minister, Faisal Saleh Hayyat, announced that Pakistani forces had captured Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, a Tanzanian Al Qaeda operative wanted in connection with the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. The timing of this announcement should be of particular interest to readers of The New Republic. Earlier this month, John B. Judis, Spencer Ackerman, and Massoud Ansari broke the story of how the Bush administration was pressuring Pakistani officials to apprehend high-value targets (HVTs) in time for the November elections--and in particular, to coincide with the Democratic National Convention. Although the capture took place in central Pakistan 'a few days back,' the announcement came just hours before John Kerry will give his acceptance speech in Boston. "

PAKISTAN FOR BUSH.
July Surprise?
by John B. Judis, Spencer Ackerman & Massoud Ansari


Issue date: 07.19.04

Late last month, President Bush lost his greatest advantage in his bid for reelection. A poll conducted by ABC News and The Washington Post discovered that challenger John Kerry was running even with the president on the critical question of whom voters trust to handle the war on terrorism. Largely as a result of the deteriorating occupation of Iraq, Bush lost what was, in April, a seemingly prohibitive 21-point advantage on his signature issue. But, even as the president's poll numbers were sliding, his administration was implementing a plan to insure the public's confidence in his hunt for Al Qaeda.

This spring, the administration significantly increased its pressure on Pakistan to kill or capture Osama bin Laden, his deputy, Ayman Al Zawahiri, or the Taliban's Mullah Mohammed Omar, all of whom are believed to be hiding in the lawless tribal areas of Pakistan. A succession of high-level American officials--from outgoing CIA Director George Tenet to Secretary of State Colin Powell to Assistant Secretary of State Christina Rocca to State Department counterterrorism chief Cofer Black to a top CIA South Asia official--have visited Pakistan in recent months to urge General Pervez Musharraf's government to do more in the war on terrorism. In April, Zalmay Khalilzad, the American ambassador to Afghanistan, publicly chided the Pakistanis for providing a "sanctuary" for Al Qaeda and Taliban forces crossing the Afghan border. "The problem has not been solved and needs to be solved, the sooner the better," he said.

This public pressure would be appropriate, even laudable, had it not been accompanied by an unseemly private insistence that the Pakistanis deliver these high-value targets (HVTs) before Americans go to the polls in November. The Bush administration denies it has geared the war on terrorism to the electoral calendar. "Our attitude and actions have been the same since September 11 in terms of getting high-value targets off the street, and that doesn't change because of an election," says National Security Council spokesman Sean McCormack. But The New Republic has learned that Pakistani security officials have been told they must produce HVTs by the election. According to one source in Pakistan's powerful Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), "The Pakistani government is really desperate and wants to flush out bin Laden and his associates after the latest pressures from the U.S. administration to deliver before the [upcoming] U.S. elections." Introducing target dates for Al Qaeda captures is a new twist in U.S.-Pakistani counterterrorism relations--according to a recently departed intelligence official, "no timetable[s]" were discussed in 2002 or 2003--but the November election is apparently bringing a new deadline pressure to the hunt. Another official, this one from the Pakistani Interior Ministry, which is responsible for internal security, explains, "The Musharraf government has a history of rescuing the Bush administration. They now want Musharraf to bail them out when they are facing hard times in the coming elections." (These sources insisted on remaining anonymous. Under Pakistan's Official Secrets Act, an official leaking information to the press can be imprisoned for up to ten years.)

A third source, an official who works under ISI's director, Lieutenant General Ehsan ul-Haq, informed tnr that the Pakistanis "have been told at every level that apprehension or killing of HVTs before [the] election is [an] absolute must." What's more, this source claims that Bush administration officials have told their Pakistani counterparts they have a date in mind for announcing this achievement: "The last ten days of July deadline has been given repeatedly by visitors to Islamabad and during [ul-Haq's] meetings in Washington." Says McCormack: "I'm aware of no such comment." But according to this ISI official, a White House aide told ul-Haq last spring that "it would be best if the arrest or killing of [any] HVT were announced on twenty-six, twenty-seven, or twenty-eight July"--the first three days of the Democratic National Convention in Boston.

The Bush administration has matched this public and private pressure with enticements and implicit threats. During his March visit to Islamabad, Powell designated Pakistan a major non-nato ally, a status that allows its military to purchase a wider array of U.S. weaponry. Powell pointedly refused to criticize Musharraf for pardoning nuclear physicist A.Q. Khan--who, the previous month, had admitted exporting nuclear secrets to Iran, North Korea, and Libya--declaring Khan's transgressions an "internal" Pakistani issue. In addition, the administration is pushing a five-year, $3 billion aid package for Pakistan through Congress over Democratic concerns about the country's proliferation of nuclear technology and lack of democratic reform.

But Powell conspicuously did not commit the United States to selling F-16s to Pakistan, which it desperately wants in order to tilt the regional balance of power against India. And the Pakistanis fear that, if they don't produce an HVT, they won't get the planes. Equally, they fear that, if they don't deliver, either Bush or a prospective Kerry administration would turn its attention to the apparent role of Pakistan's security establishment in facilitating Khan's illicit proliferation network. One Pakistani general recently in Washington confided in a journalist, "If we don't find these guys by the election, they are going to stick this whole nuclear mess up our asshole."

Pakistani perceptions of U.S. politics reinforce these worries. "In Pakistan, there has been a folk belief that, whenever there's a Republican administration in office, relations with Pakistan have been very good," says Khalid Hasan, a U.S. correspondent for the Lahore-based Daily Times. By contrast, there's also a "folk belief that the Democrats are always pro-India." Recent history has validated those beliefs. The Clinton administration inherited close ties to Pakistan, forged a decade earlier in collaboration against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. But, by the time Clinton left office, the United States had tilted toward India, and Pakistan was under U.S. sanctions for its nuclear activities. All this has given Musharraf reason not just to respond to pressure from Bush, but to feel invested in him--and to worry that Kerry, who called the Khan affair a "disaster," and who has proposed tough new curbs on nuclear proliferation, would adopt an icier line.

Bush's strategy could work. In large part because of the increased U.S. pressure, Musharraf has, over the last several months, significantly increased military activity in the tribal areas--regions that enjoy considerable autonomy from Islamabad and where, until Musharraf sided with the United States in the war on terrorism, Pakistani soldiers had never set foot in the nation's 50-year history. Thousands of Pakistani troops fought a pitched battle in late March against tribesmen and their Al Qaeda affiliates in South Waziristan in hopes of capturing Zawahiri. The fighting escalated significantly in June. Attacks on army camps in the tribal areas brought fierce retaliation, leaving over 100 tribal and foreign militants and Pakistani soldiers dead in three days. Last month, Pakistan killed a powerful Waziristan warlord and Qaeda ally, Nek Mohammed, in a dramatic rocket attack that villagers said bore American fingerprints. (They claim a U.S. spy plane had been circling overhead.) Through these efforts, the Pakistanis could bring in bin Laden, Mullah Omar, or Zawahiri--a significant victory in the war on terrorism that would bolster Bush's reputation among voters.

But there is a reason many Pakistanis and some American officials had previously been reluctant to carry the war on terrorism into the tribal areas. A Pakistani offensive in that region, aided by American high-tech weaponry and perhaps Special Forces, could unite tribal chieftains against the central government and precipitate a border war without actually capturing any of the HVTs. Military action in the tribal areas "has a domestic fallout, both religious and ethnic," Pakistani Foreign Minister Mian Khursheed Mehmood Kasuri complained to the Los Angeles Times last year. Some American intelligence officials agree. "Pakistan just can't risk a civil war in that area of their country. They can't afford a western border that is unstable," says a senior intelligence official, who anonymously authored the recent Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror and who says he has not heard that the current pressures on Pakistan are geared to the election. "We may be at the point where [Musharraf] has done almost as much as he can."

Pushing Musharraf to go after Al Qaeda in the tribal areas may be a good idea despite the risks. But, if that is the case, it was a good idea in 2002 and 2003. Why the switch now? Top Pakistanis think they know: This year, the president's reelection is at stake.

Massoud Ansari reported from Karachi.

Americans' incomes fell for two years from 2000 to 2002 - Jul. 29, 2004

Yeah, I could've told you this. Wonder what the report in 2006 will say about 2002-2004? Same shit, different year.

Americans' incomes fell for two years from 2000 to 2002 - Jul. 29, 2004

Wednesday, July 28, 2004

Dufus...

So, quite a few years ago - pundits, the 'liberal' media, all the ranters and ravers on the right, had just a hoot and a howl over a picture of Michael Dukaksis in a tank.  Yesterday, the Boston Herald had a pic of Kerry in a space suit, implying that he, and all the other bio-chem, astronaut, risk thier lives daily types look silly in their suits.  Sooo...I want to take this opportunity to present this:

And this, another bumpersticker I just love,from http://www.seeyageorge.com




CNN.com - Florida officials: Some voting records wiped out - Jul 28, 2004

Sunday, July 25, 2004

t r u t h o u t - Michael Avery | Police Cage Free Speech in Boston

Those protesting at the democratic national convention actually get to see the delegates. If Avery wants to protest at the republican national convetion he'll be so far away he wouldn't be able to see a fucking thing. Now, don't get me wrong, protesting is all fine and good. Hell, Kerry was my 4th choice on the original list of nine and I'm certainly not fond of some of his votes in the last three years.

I certainly hope, though, that Mr Avery demostrates at the republican convetion, too, and then devotes another 1039 words to that experience.

from the article: Of course, the court was free to decide that the government had not proven that the conditions were necessary and a more intrepid judge would have done so. What is genuinely "irretrievably sad" is that the judicial branch has accepted so uncritically the demands of the security arm of the state and that one of the lessons of this convention is that the First Amendment is now in urgent need of a life support system to survive.

There have been actual threats to newsmedia at the convention. I think a little prevention is prudent. And I think Mr Avery needs a re-read of the First Amendment. Are the demonstrators being told they can't? Anyone, anyone??

If these people REALLY want to speak out against constitutional violations, perhaps they should save their pennies and protest the republicans that dreamt up that stupid PATRIOT ACT. 'Cept that if Avery and his group went to NYC, no one would see 'em.

t r u t h o u t - Michael Avery Police Cage Free Speech in Boston

Friday, July 23, 2004

Convention protestors

Those protesting the Repubs have to go to the West Side Highway...not Times Square, not Central Park, not 3rd Street...

Those protesting the Democrats can be across the street...

There has been a threat to the democratic media from some domestic rightwing nut-job group, yet they are still allowed to protest.

Those protesting the Republicans were told to 'stay to the route' or go to jail.

Is anyone surprised that this republican administration has still not prosecuted anyone for outing Valerie Plame or for targeting democratic congresspeople with anthrax??

Thursday, July 22, 2004

Democrats blast GOP lawmaker's 'suppress the Detroit vote' remark

There's more than one way to 'suppress' a vote. Telling people they can't vote if they haven't paid parking tickets or if they owe back child support. Promoting the wrong voting day....Of course, a thinking electorate could go a long way to thwarting any vote-supression.

So, if you are in a 'battle ground' state - know that the date to vote is TUESDAY NOVEMBER 2, 2004. Know that your employer has to give you time either before or after your shift to exercise your rights, and please, please, please look for the relevant voting laws in your community - print them out and take a copy with you so they can't give you any shit. Take a photo ID and your voter registration card.

AND BY ALL MEANS, IF YOUR JURISDICTION USES A TOUCH-SCREEN VOTING MACHINE - VOTE ABSENTEE!!

Democrats blast GOP lawmaker's 'suppress the Detroit vote' remark
July 21, 2004, 5:05 PM


DETROIT (AP) -- Democrats on Wednesday denounced a Republican lawmaker quoted in a newspaper as saying the GOP would fare poorly in this year's elections if it failed to "suppress the Detroit vote."
...
"This is the endgame strategy the Republican Party has decided to utilize, rather than positive strategies," he (Rep. Alexander Lipsey, D-Kalamazoo.) said. "They are strategizing, "How can we get those folks we don't care about from going to the polls?"'

Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | Axis of liars

I sure do wish this would run on the front page of USA Today...

Guardian Unlimited Special reports Axis of liars

Bush refused for a time to hand over some relevant documents, and he refused to appear before the commission (President Clinton did, with no qualms). He agreed to only after four conditions were met:

· That his testimony would not be under oath
· That he would only appear if he could have Dick Cheney with him (I guess to answer the questions)
· That it would not be open to the public
· That there would be no recording of any of it.
And to top it all, Republicans put a "fix" in the law that prevented the commission from apportioning blame for 9/11
...
It also reveals that there were 10 opportunities (six under Bush and four under Clinton) to derail the plot before the attacks, but then it whitewashes by not really "indicting" anyone.
...
Did Clinton share some responsibility? Absolutely, and the commission concludes that. But remember, when Clinton tried to have Osama bin Laden killed, some Republicans in congress criticized him for trying to draw attention from their top priority, Monica Lewinsky.





CNN.com - House�strips federal courts of jurisdiction over�same-sex marriage - Jul 22, 2004

I just don't know what to say? Do our lawmakers need a refresher course in high school american goverment? There's just something creepy about a legislative body telling the courts that they don't have jurisdiction over something...anything. Our government was founded on, and works because we have, separation of powers. If they can get away with restricting the jurisdiction of federal courts over same sex marriage, will they soon do the same for abortion?

CNN.com - House strips federal courts of jurisdiction over same-sex marriage - Jul 22, 2004

The 9/11 Commission

Hastert is having a field day blaming Clinton for the 9/11 screw ups.  After all, he was in office eight years.  Before you buy that crap, note this:  of the ten "missed opportunities" to derail the 9/11 plot cited in the report, four occurred during President Clinton's eight-year term in office and six occurred in the first eight months of President Bush's administration.  And then read about how the Bush administration wanted to derail the commission.

Tuesday, July 20, 2004

Does this not rise to the level of intervention?

Ok, Sadaam was a jackass. Bad man. Evil man. Dictator. Killed people.  So, why aren't we going in guns a blazing to Sudan?

The United Nations says fighting between Arab Janjaweed militias and African rebels in Darfur, western Sudan, has killed some 30,000 people and created the world's worst humanitarian crisis with 1 million people forced to flee their homes.
...
"Rapes are still occurring. People do not feel safe leaving the camps to go out and forage for food. The situation remains very, very serious, and first and foremost the security has to be dealt with," he added.
Powell's blunt comments suggest Washington may be closer to pushing for a vote on a U.N. Security Council resolution that would place an immediate travel and arms ban on the militias and threatens to extend the sanctions to the Khartoum government.

....
ooooo...UN sanctions.  Why would it work for sudan when it didn't work in iraq. Better yet, why does the Bush admin. support sanctions when they didn't in iraq?

Happy Tuesday, again

It's July 20, 2004, the 35th anniversary of the moon landing.  When we put our collective mind to it, we can do such remarkable things...



Monday, July 19, 2004

Hold them responsible

Can the Bush administration really say with a straight face that they  "support the troops" while so many "higher ups" that sanctioned the abuse of prisoners are not being held responsible? That doesn't sound like much support to me.
 
Officers' Unheroic Example
By Jackson DiehlMonday, July 19, 2004; Page A17

More Iran stuff - Haliburton subpoenaed

Halliburton is subpoenaed over Iran ties

A grand jury subpoenas info about its Cayman Islands unit, which has operations in Iran.July 19, 2004: 5:41 PM EDT

HOUSTON (Reuters) - Oil field services company Halliburton Co. received a grand jury subpoena earlier this month seeking information about its Cayman Islands unit, which conducts operations in Iran, the company said Monday.

"In July 2004, Halliburton received from an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Texas a grand jury subpoena requesting the production of documents. We intend to cooperate with the government's investigation," Halliburton said in a filing to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Halliburton (HAL: Research, Estimates), formerly headed by Vice President Dick Cheney, has been cooperating since 2001 with the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control in an inquiry into the Cayman Islands unit's operations inside Iran.

U.S. companies are prohibited by law from doing business with Iran.
Halliburton's engineering and construction unit KBR, formerly called Kellogg Brown & Root, is also the subject of U.S. Justice Department and SEC investigations for possible overcharges for fuel and food service contracts in Iraq, where it is the largest contractor.

Halliburton officials said the company would comply with the subpoena and reiterated that the company's links to Iran through its Cayman Islands unit were in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

"It is important to understand, especially in the current political environment, that this is not a condemnation of the company but a method of further studying the facts. We welcome a thorough review of any and all of the company's business," Halliburton spokeswoman Wendy Hall said in an e-mail.  

Iran connection?

Please tell me the war on Iraq wasn't caused by a typo. Kidding. Here's the story at the NYTimes (if you haven't already, you might need to register to read it, but it's free to do so).

From the article, Bush says: "I have long expressed my concerns about Iran. After all, it's a totalitarian society where free people are not allowed to, you know, exercise their rights as human beings." He said that "this has been an issue that I have been concerned about ever since I've been the president."

Of couse, this concern about a "totalitarian society where free people are not allowed to, you know, exercise their rights as human beings" doesn't apply to Saudia Arabia. Remember - most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi - not Iraqi.

If find it difficult, very difficult, to believe that this 9/11 Commission discovered stuff that was unknown to the Administration. That is, of course, unless the Bush admin. didn't WANT to know about it.

Personally, I think the link is tenuous at best. The hijackers might have gone though Iran, but they also went through Boston, Phoenix and Florida.

Four months from now, when we are "preempting" Iran, remember that this article says: "Mr. Bush noted in a brief Oval Office meeting with reporters that the Central Intelligence Agency had found "no direct connection between Iran and the attacks of Sept.11," (side bar -- "MR" Bush? Oh my. Didn't he give some reporter shit about being called "MR" Bush? I seem to recall he did....)

"The evidence about an Iran-Qaeda tie contrasts sharply with what the Sept. 11 commission staff has concluded is a dearth of intelligence showing a working relationship between Iraq and the terror network, a judgment that has alarmed the White House since it appears to undermine a central justification of last year's invasion of Iraq."
 
Acting Director of the CIA, John E. McLaughlin, said of the report: "We have no evidence that there is some sort of official sanction by the government of Iran for this activity," he said. "We have no evidence that there is some sort of official connection between Iran and 9/11."
 
I really don't think this will deter the Bush Administration if they fall in the poll numbers in the next couple of months. 

CNN.com - Ronstadt tossed over 'Fahrenheit' praise - Jul 19, 2004

Once again, expressing an opinion (if you are an "entertainer") gets someone in trouble.

Can we PLEASE get rid of Dennis Miller?

CNN.com - Ronstadt tossed over 'Fahrenheit' praise - Jul 19, 2004

Nader accepts Republican signatures to ensure a ballot spot in Michigan

Another rug pulled out from under the "I'll take votes from the Republicans, too" lie that Nader tells. "Republican Party officials submitted 43,000 signatures...to ensure Nader could appear on the ballot as an independent. Republicans began collecting signatures after it appeared that Nader might not get on the ballot as the Reform Party's candidate for president."

Nader accepts Republican signatures to ensure a ballot spot in Michigan

GOPs Big Tent Minstral Show

Meet the delegates: http://www.gopconvention.com/contents/delegates/meet/
(notice anything interesting? Here's hint.  They found 5 black republicans to put on their page to give the appearance that they are inclusuive.  This adminstration has disenfranchised more African American voters than any other, yet they are quick to put five faces up there to show their inclusiveness.) 
 
Under the FAQ section of the delegates page you'll see this pic of the 2000 Montana delgates:


And of the 2000 Wisconsin delgates:


Notice anything missing from those pictures?? Have that many more African Americans joined the Bush team in the last four years? Doubt it.



Happy Monday

Hello.  Just posting this a.m. because I changed some settings on this blog and want to see if they took...

Sunday, July 18, 2004

Sunday Night

I did not get my car washed. I did not clean the house.  I built a website devoted to Melissa pictures.
 
I did go shopping -- or rather my version of it.  I knew exactly what I was looking for - went in to each store looking only for that and when I couldn't find it in any store, I left.  I have the man-shopping gene. The straight man shopping gene. I wear only Levi's because I know my size, the cut never changes and I never have to try them on. Same with shoes.  Boots, really.  I wear one style and one style only, and I buy two pair at a time so I have an extra to hold me over if the store runs out. 
 
So, I'm looking for a pajamma set for my grandmother. Rather, my mother is having me look for a pajamma set for my grandmother.  Which is fine and gives me some connection to home. But I can't find anything.  Short sleeved, all cotton, button down, collared with pants (not shorts) in women's 1X. I can find variations on the theme, but not exactly what I'm sent for. 
 
I did not watch the news today, although I really wish I would have.  Senator Byrd called bush on the carpet. "dangerous, reckless and arrogant."  I could not agree more.  If the link doesn't work, search MSNBC videos for it.  I like Byrd. He's one of the few democrats with any balls (or ovaries, as the case may be).  Too bad they aren't all like him.   You really need to read this - the Arrogance of Power.
 
But, today I weep for my country. I have watched the events of recent months with a heavy, heavy heart. No more is the image of America one of strong, yet benevolent peacekeeper. The image of America has changed. Around the globe, our friends mistrust us, our word is disputed, our intentions are questioned.

Instead of reasoning with those with whom we disagree, we demand obedience or threaten recrimination. Instead of isolating Saddam Hussein, we seem to have isolated ourselves. We proclaim a new doctrine of preemption which is understood by few and feared by many. We say that the United States has the right to turn its firepower on any corner of the globe which might be suspect in the war on terrorism. We assert that right without the sanction of any international body. As a result, the world has become a much more dangerous place.

We flaunt our superpower status with arrogance. We treat UN Security Council members like ingrates who offend our princely dignity by lifting their heads from the carpet. Valuable alliances are split.

 
Monday will be a good day.  I'll get to listen to Air America and Randi Rhodes. 

Republican actors elected to office

So,the right will spew bile every time an "entertainer" speaks out on an issue but they will overwhelmingly elect them to office. So, why is it that "entertainers" aren't fit to excercise their First Amendment Rights, but they are fit to run local, state and national governments?  Republican hypocrisy.
 
George Murphy was elected to the U.S. Senate from California in 1964
Ronald Reagan - CA governor and the US President
In 1986, Fred Grandy- California Congressman
Sonny Bono - California Congerssmam in 1994.
Clint Eastwood successfully ran for mayor of Carmel, California. 
Fred Thompson just finished serving 8 years in the U.S. Senate before returning to acting as, ironically, an elected district attorney on NBC's Law and Order.
Arnold Schwarzenegger, California's governor

Schwarzenegger's homophobic remarks aimed at state legislators

What an asshole.  I'm not as offended at the "girlie man" thing as I am at the threat to "terminate" those that don't agree w/ his budget.  Could you imgine the uproar if this comment would have come from a democrat? Hell, CNN would be interrupting programming for "breaking news."
 
Gov. Criticizes Legislators as 'Girlie Men'

from the article:

Democratic lawmakers, gay and lesbian advocates and feminist groups bristled over the governor's comments, which were greeted with sustained applause by hundreds of people who were invited to the rally through automated phone calls put out by Schwarzenegger's camp.
.....
Senate President Pro Tem John Burton (D-San Francisco) said he was "nonplused" by Schwarzenegger's comment.

"I don't know what the definition of 'girlie man' is. As opposed to his being a he-man?" Burton asked. "I can't think of a way to have the he-man and the girlie men join hands around the Capitol and sing 'Kum Ba Ya.' "

Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez (D-Los Angeles) said, "Those are the kinds of statements that ought not to come out of the mouth" of the governor.

"He says he's going to 'terminate' members in November? I really don't know what he means by that. That's not funny any more," Nuñez said.


Happy Sunday

Happy July 18.  It's Sunday.  I'm going shopping, cleaning the house, and getting the vehicle washed.  Some fun, huh?
 
Todays Diversion: Albino Blacksheep
Must see from that site: George Bush's Desktop

Saturday, July 17, 2004

t r u t h o u t - Bush Administration Stonewalling U.N. Auditors on Iraq No-Bid Contracts

Double standards, double standards. The Clinton adminstration got grilled in the media because they couldn't find a couple of boxes of Whitewater documents. Why doesn't the "liberal media" cover this with such vigor?

t r u t h o u t - Bush Administration Stonewalling U.N. Auditors on Iraq No-Bid Contracts

United Nations - The Bush administration is withholding information from U.N.-sanctioned auditors examining more than $1 billion in contracts awarded to Halliburton Co. and other companies in Iraq without competitive bidding, the head of the international auditing board said Thursday.

Jean-Pierre Halbwachs, the U.N. representative to the International Advisory and Monitoring Board (IAMB), said that the United States has repeatedly rebuffed his requests since March to turn over internal audits, including one that covered three contracts valued at $1.4 billion that were awarded to Halliburton, a Texas-based oil services firm. It has also failed to produced a list of other companies that have obtained contracts without having to compete.

The New Republic Online: Secrets and Lies

The New Republic Online: Secrets and Lies
The Senate Intelligence Committee's report on prewar U.S. intelligence about Iraq makes for enthralling reading. But almost as interesting are the vast sections we can't read. About 15 percent of the report is bathed in black ink, redacted because the CIA deemed the information classified. But those redactions are highly suspect. First, the CIA tried to black out about half of the report. Then, after protests from Congress, the Agency yielded, to no demonstrable harm. Second, many of the heavily redacted sections deal with the most politically sensitive topics, such as whether intelligence analysts were pressured by administration officials, and the story behind President Bush's claim that Saddam Hussein sought uranium from Africa.


Happy Saturday

Hey all. Happy Saturday. My honey arrived home safely.  S'posed to be 108 here again today. No rain. We didn't get any yesterday, either.  Not gonna have any for a week, at least.  Have a good day.

Friday, July 16, 2004

TheLouisvilleChannel.com - Helen Thomas - Iraq War Could Harm War On Terrorism

Floridians are gonna have cable installers snooping for terrorists

Are we in communist Russia?? Do we really thing that someone is qualified to spot a terrorist after taking a 45-minute training class and reading a brochure?

Two stories on this from the Orlando Sentinal

Some fear 'awareness' could mean profiling

By Brian Baskin Sentinel Staff Writer
Posted July 9, 2004

Local and national civil-rights groups predict that a plan to train firefighters, cable repairmen and others to ferret out terrorism, drug trafficking and child pornography for local police will result in racial profiling and innocent citizens being subjected to terrorism investigations.

"We're afraid law-abiding members of our community will be targeted simply because of their appearance," said Taleb Salhab, president of the Arab-American Community Center of Central Florida.

Chief among the organizations' concerns is a brochure intended to be distributed to Citizen Awareness Program trainees that lists "multiple adult males living together, usually of Middle Eastern appearance and between the ages of 18 and 45, with little or no furnishings," as one of five signs of international terrorism.

Arab-American leaders are worried that racial profiling could result.

Orange-Osceola State Attorney Lawson Lamar, one of CAP's architects, dismissed charges levied by four groups, including the American-Arab Discrimination Committee and the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, that innocent citizens who look Arab could come under suspicion through the program.

"I think this thing will get some legs even though there are some people who are more concerned with being politically correct than saving lives," Lamar said Thursday.

An estimated 5,000 brochures have already been printed, at a cost of $500 to the Sheriff's Office, Chief Steve Jones said.

The sheriff's intelligence unit, which would receive all tips generated by the program, is trained to screen out bad leads, Lamar said. He contends that would eliminate the risk that innocent people will become suspects in terrorism investigations.

Salhab said such safeguards have failed to prevent innocent Arab-Americans from being singled out for surveillance or detention in the past.

"How much heartache would an individual have to go through before they verified that a person is innocent," he said. "Without a doubt, it's going to be our community who will be most affected."

The groups' concerns echoes the fallout from Operation TIPS, a similar program proposed in July 2002 by President Bush, then abruptly withdrawn in the ensuing uproar from civil-liberties organizations.

"Seems like Central Florida agencies . . . are taking a step back and trying things that have already failed at the federal level," said Ahmed Bedir, communications director for the Florida chapter of the Council of American-Islamic Relations. "It doesn't make any sense why they're doing this now."

Lamar wants to expand CAP to include fire-rescue workers, cable technicians, trash collectors, utility workers and others. Several area companies that would be eligible to participate have their own answer to CAP: They said they already train employees to spot suspicious activity.

Cable-modem installers for Florida Cable are already taught to recognize signs of child pornography on home computers, said Chief Operating Officer John Russo.

The Orlando Utilities Commission also encourages employees to report "unusual situations" when they make house calls, said spokeswoman Samantha Wilson. But she said OUC will not decide whether to join CAP until it is approached by the Sheriff's Office.

CAP participants will receive a 45-minute training from members of the Sheriff's Office intelligence unit. They will also be given a brochure, titled "Citizen Awareness Program, Working Together for a Safer America."

Along with warning signs for terrorism, the brochure lists indicators of drug abuse, ranging from cocaine and heroin to "unusual power bills, high or large spikes in usage" and "unusual odors or chemicals."

Child pornography could be present, according to the brochure, if the home contains a "large collection of untitled video tapes or tapes with sexually explicit titles," "multiple photos of a variety of children, either clothed, partially nude, or completely nude," and "tape, rope, handcuffs, or wire, usually kept in a garage that may be hidden in a closet."

The brochure names Central Florida's Domestic Security Task Force as CAP's sponsor. Lamar is the intelligence chairman of the task force.

Gio Morales, a spokesman for the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, which created the task force, said FDLE was not involved in any aspect of CAP, though FDLE Regional Director Joyce Dawley is listed on the CAP brochure as co-chair of the Domestic Security Task Force.

Dawley could not be reached for comment Thursday.

Brian Baskin can be reached at bbaskin@orlandosentinel.com or

407-420-5446.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++

'Aware' primer will be revised

After ethnic-profiling complaints, details on how to spot terrorists will be altered.

By Brian Baskin Sentinel Staff Writer
Posted July 16, 2004

A program that will urge workers in Orange County such as cable TV installers and firefighters to report suspicious or illegal activities they spot in private homes will be rewritten after complaints the plan would target Arab-Americans.

The Orange County Sheriff's office has already printed 5,000 training brochures outlining the Citizen Awareness Program, which seeks to train workers who regularly enter private homes to identify signs of terrorism, drug trafficking and child pornography. But law enforcement officials will now scrap the brochures -- one week after the Florida ACLU and others labeled the effort as an attempt to create a citizen spy network that would infringe on privacy rights.

The sharpest criticism came from Arab-Americans, who said language in the brochure amounted to racial profiling because it said several adult males "usually of Middle Eastern appearance" who live together with little or no furnishings could be a sign of international terrorism.

The brochures will be rewritten and references to specific ethnic groups will be removed from the final version, said Joyce Dawley, regional director for the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and co-chairman of the Central Florida's Domestic Security Task Force, which oversees the program.

"You don't want to focus for a number of reasons on any one group," Dawley said. "A number of different groups out there are willing to hurt people."

Dawley and other law enforcement officials will present a full list of revisions to leaders in Orlando's Arab-American community this morning, said Taleb Salhab, president of the Arab-American Community Center of Central Florida.

Other aspects of the plan will also change, Dawley said, though she would not elaborate.

Lt. Lee Massie, deputy chief of the Sheriff's Office intelligence unit, who designed much of the program, said the brochures were not meant to be a final version, only a draft. But officials said last week they spent $500 on the 5,000 copies and contacted Orange County Fire Rescue Division to talk about starting training sessions.

Massie said the brochure went to print before it was ready and would have been recommissioned anyway to correct design flaws.

"It's common practice not to put a working draft to print," Massie said. "When it came back it was not very well done."

Dawley, of the FDLE, said the program will proceed despite the criticism. Operation TIPS, a similar program attempted at the federal level in 2002, was scrapped after civil liberties organizations objected.

The revisions mark the first time the FDLE has actively participated in designing CAP. Dawley said she approved of the idea when the Sheriff's Office presented it to FDLE shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and has always supported the program.

But though she sat in on planning meetings, Dawley said she had not offered specific suggestions until Orange County Sheriff Kevin Beary approached her this week about revising the program.

Orange-Osceola State Attorney Lawson Lamar, who came up with the initial idea and is one of the program's most vocal supporters, was not involved in this week's revisions, according to Lisa Roberson, a spokeswoman for Lamar.

Dawley said she expected the program would draw criticism, but that she strongly believes that it is necessary and will not intrude on people's rights.

"We don't want to make [trainee] agents of the government, we just want them to be aware of their surroundings," Dawley said.

Mark NeJame, a defense attorney and one of the Arab-American leaders meeting with law enforcement officials today, said the promised revisions are an encouraging sign.

"There's been a healthy ongoing dialogue between certain leaders of the Arabic-American community and certain leaders in law enforcement," he said.

But the Sheriff's Office should have told Orlando's Arab-American community long before the program was about to begin, NeJame said.

"If there were people involved in the onset from the Arab-American community, it might prevent a lot of these reactive measures from having to be taken because they may never have occurred in the first place," he said.

Other groups that were at the forefront of the fight against Operation TIPS are still waiting to give their ideas about the Florida program.

The Florida chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations tried and failed to get a copy of the program brochure from the Orange County Sheriff's Office, according to spokesman Ahmed Bedir. The group is still trying to schedule a meeting with FDLE to discuss the plan.The Florida ACLU is also largely in the dark, said Scott Rost, Central Florida chapter chairman. But he said the Citizens Awareness Program is probably unfixable.

"We think it should die a merciful death in the near future because of public outcry, just like [Operation TIPS] did," Rost said.

Brian Baskin can be reached at 407-420-5446 or bbaskin@orlandosentinel.com.


How dictatorial is this???

CNN.com - House strikes heated comments from record - Jul 16, 2004

So, Corrine Brown, on the floor of the House yesterday, said that an outside organization should oversee our elections in November because in 2000 they were stolen. Her comments were stricken from the record and she was banned from speaking. Are we or are we not a country that is represented by our duly elected officials. Is disagreeing with the administration such a sin that those that dare speak out get censured and banned?
 
You can find the press release by Corrine Brown here.

Salon.com | The real flip-flopper

Salon.com The real flip-flopper

The list of Bush's major policy U-turns is as audacious as it is long. Among the whiplash-inducing lowlights:

In September 2001, Bush said capturing bin Laden was "our No. 1 priority." By March 2002, he was claiming, "I don't know where he is. I have no idea and I really don't care. It's not that important."

In October 2001, he was dead set against the need for a Department of Homeland Security. Seven months later, he thought it was a great idea.

In May 2002, he opposed the creation of the 9/11 commission. Four months later, he supported it.

During the 2000 campaign, he said that gay marriage was a states' rights issue: "The states can do what they want to do." During the 2004 campaign, he called for a constitutional ban on gay marriage.

This is a Salon Premium (R) article. Please purchase a subscription or watch the commercial for a free day pass. Thanks.


Hmm...They are leaving Iraq.

First the Filipinos pull out. Now the SaudisCAIRO, Egypt (AP) - A Saudi company employing an Egyptian driver held hostage by an insurgent group in Iraq said Wednesday it was prepared to leave the country to win the captive's freedom. Faisal al-Naheet, spokesman for the unidentified Saudi company, told Al-Jazeera television his company was "ready to end its work in Iraq to fulfill the kidnappers' demand to release the Egyptian driver."

Today's Picture - Republican Candor


Happy Friday.

Happy Friday, y'all. July 16th. 108 here in Phoenix with about 40% humidity. Praying for rain....
Best of all, my honey's comin' home from Texas today after a week in San Antonio.  I'm overjoyed.

Thursday, July 15, 2004

Republican Hypocrisy

ABCNEWS.com : Memo Rips GOP Hopeful for 'Lewd' Actions

First it was the Jack Ryan scandal, and now it seems that another "potential Republican candidate for the Senate seat from Illinois" has withdrawn. Something about "'lewd and abusive behavior' while she served as a top official in the White House drug policy office."

ABCNEWS.com : Memo Rips GOP Hopeful for 'Lewd' Actions: "The lewd and abusive behavior finding stemmed from a Dec. 19, 2002, staff gathering. Barthwell made comments about a staff member's sexual orientation after the staff member misspoke in an earlier conversation, the memorandum said.
'Dr. Barthwell made reference to this staff member sitting on men's laps. A kaleidoscope pointed upward was placed on a chair by Dr. Barthwell as the staff member was about to sit down,' it said.
'Dr. Barthwell suggested that the staff member would want to cut the cake available for the gathering because the knife was 'long and hard' and he might 'enjoy handling it.' When the cake was cut, Dr. Barthwell referred to the pieces as 'most' or 'beefy' and she said to the staff member, 'I know you like it big and meaty.''"

You know, ya gotta wonder about the gay bashing covertly endorsed by the Bush administration. There's this Barthwell woman, and then the following from Dennis Miller at a fundraiser for Bush (to keep this in perspective two weeks from now when this is all old news, Dennis said this almost immediately after Whoopi Goldberg got "fired" from a Slim-Fast campaign after make a "Bush" joke at a Dem. Fundraiser. Further proof that Republicans are WIMPS and can't take a damned joke). From the Washington Post:

Speaking of celebrity endorsements: Dennis Miller, a big backer of Bush, was in Green Bay, Wis., yesterday to warm up the crowd before the prez spoke. Miller made a glancing reference to Whoopi but promised, "In deference to George W. Bush, I will try not to fall to depths that some would in this case."

Then he went on to imply a homosexual attraction between Kerry and Edwards.

"Those two cannot keep their hands off each other, can they?" Miller said. "I think I have a new idea for a new campaign slogan -- use the bumper sticker 'Hey, Get A Room.' "

The Post's Dana Milbank also reports that Miller riffed on other noted Dems. "Asking Bill Clinton to write an honest book is like asking Britney Spears to sing a capella," he said.

And he called strategist James Carville "a muppet who accidentally was washed on hot" and a "Satanic Chihuahua under a strobe light" who has "more nervous ticks than a Belfast parking valet."

All in good fun, of course. Bush thanked Miller "for joining us" but made no mention of his warm-up act.

With Anne Schroeder


Now...Republicans are "family values" yet they have affairs and get busted for sexual harassment. They can't take a joke directed at them, but it's OK gay-bait at one of their fundraisers. Hypocrites.


Nader and the Repubicans

So, Nader gets some press about the repugs helping him get on the ballot, then he changes his mind. (The 'gets some press' link is a premium article at Salon.com. If you aren't gonna shell out a few cents to buy a yearly subscription, at least watch the 'commercial' and get  day pass).

Cheney and his doc - just a rumor of replacement?

Don't you sometimes wish there was an alternate universe in which you could see events unfold, just to see if you would have gotten it right had things been different?  There's an article in today's New York Times stating this big ol' rumor in DC that Cheney dropped his doc so that he could get another one to delcare him "unfit" so that Bush could safely drop him from the ticket. Now that the rumor's out, looks like Bush is stuck with him.  Wonder if the rumor is out in the A.U.

Marriage and the Netherlands

So, a senator or two said that families in the netherlands have been virtually destroyed since the recognition of same sex marriages.

They need to read this

Bloody coup?

So, I'm listening to www.airamericaradio.com (Randi Rhodes is my new hero, btw). Caller mentions the Ridge-hyped terror attacks around election time.

She hypothesizes...terror attack - takes out Kerry and Edwards. Martial Law is instituted. We've got a theocracy.

Gave me chills, ya know?

Happy Thursday.

Happy Thursday. :)